Volume IX - Issue X - October 2007
Second Edition
Second Editions include selected high quality papers previously published in another journal in a language other than English. Republication is with the permission from the author and journal of original publication.
Popularity vs. Profession: The Project Management Dilemma By Ruth Murray-Webster & Peter Simon Editor’s note: This paper was originally published as Lucid Thought no. 34 in April 2007 by Lucidus Consulting in the UK. It addresses an interesting and important dilemma related to the debate about project management as a profession. It is reproduced here with approval of the authors and Lucidus Consulting. For more information, see author bios at end of article.
Project management is already considered by many to be a profession but some of us remain to be convinced. In order to remove any possible doubt the already converted are aiming to convert the rest of us by:
Unfortunately this move to further recognition is complicated by one very important word ‘project’. It used to mean a unique piece of work delivered within time, cost and quality constraints to meet objectives (or whatever variation on this description you prefer) but over time this seemingly clear definition has become muddy. The word project is now firmly set in common parlance. Not only do we have projects to manage the building of a 100,000 seat sports stadium or to launch a new bank account but our children have history projects to produce a piece of researched work on the Romans or the Cold War. This means ‘we’ have conspired to create a vast number of projects ranging from the biggest and most complex endeavours ever undertaken to projects that are simple and are carried out by an individual person without any need to involve anyone else (apart from willing parents and friends). As a result of having a vast number of projects we suddenly have a vast number of people who call themselves project manager. Read the complete paper English
A Short History of Modern Project Management By Alan Stretton, PhD Editor’s Note:This paper was originally prepared and used for a Modern Project Management Course at the University of Technology, Sdyney, Australia, by professor Alan Stretton in the early 1990s. The paper was also originally published by the Australian Institute of Project Management (AIPM) in instalments in the “Australian Project Manager”, Part 1 in Vol 14, No 1, March 1994; Part 2 in Vol 14, No 2, July 1994; and Part 3 in Vol 14, No 3, October 1994. In his paper, Professor Stretton provides some historical perspective on the development of modern project management up until that time. We at PM World Today thought it might be useful for some readers to read these historical developments. This paper is re-published herein with author approval and the approval of AIPMl. All rights reserved by Alan Stretton. When people talk about the history of project management, it is quite common for the Egyptian Pyramids (or the like) to be exampled as early historical projects. But there is rather widespread agreement that what could be validly called modern project management had its genesis in the 1950s. In the ensuing years, many distinctive project management tools, techniques and concepts have been, and are being, developed - particularly as the areas of application of project-based management have been proliferating so widely. This short history of modern project management focuses on mainstream issues and developments in the past forty-odd years. It also attempts to identify emerging trends in concepts and practices in project management at the time of writing (1994). The majority of the reference materials are US-sourced, with some references to early Australian developments in which the author was personally involved. Read the complete paper English
|
PM World Today™ is a trademark of pmforum.org, Inc.
PMWT™ is a trademark of pmforum.org, Inc.
The information on this web site was checked for accuracy and authenticity when last updated. If there is any accidental infringement of copyright, the publisher of this site apologize for their actions, and would like to be notified. In addition, the publisher of this site cannot bear responsibility for the actions or the results of action of individuals or companies arising from use of information and advice contained within it.
PM World Today Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions.
© Copyright 2007 PM World Today