PLEASE CLICK ON THE ICONS BELOW TO VISIT OUR SPONSORS WEB SITES
Volume X - Issue XI - November 2008
Featured Papers
By Andrew Filev Editor’s note: This paper was originally presented at the 2nd Annual UT Dallas Project Management Symposium in Richardson, Texas, USA (http://pmsymposium.utdallas.edu/) in August 2008. As a Media Partner for that event, PMForum agreed to republish selected papers in PM World Today. This paper is included here with the consent of the author and permission of the Graduate Program in Project Management at The University of Texas at Dallas School of Management, who is the copyright holder of the conference proceedings. All conditions and disclaimers of the copyright holder pertain. Contemporary project management is undergoing significant changes. Teams find other ways to manage projects, ways that differ from the traditional waterfall methodology. Today, more and more people are using blogs, wikis and collaboration planning tools to work together. These applications represent a significant opportunity for organizations to introduce more efficient collaboration and increase productivity. Traditional project management relegates all the responsibilities to one person - project manager. He acts as a proxy in all project-related communications. The result is formidable personal and team’s productivity reduction. The change in project management comes with a change in tools. The new wave of project management applications puts an emphasis on collaboration and makes teams much more productive. These applications use the power of two simple practices - collective intelligence and emergent structures. The software industry was the first to adopt these new practices. Agile project management, as it is called in software development, easily took over the software industry in several years because of the benefits it brings to companies. These practices, supported by tools, processes and people, bring a dramatic increase in key performance indicators for companies. Today they are used by successful teams ranging from two individuals to thousands of people. New generation tools are not only incredibly helpful in managing distributed teams in today’s global environment, but also able to take care of a lot of routine operations for you. Read complete paper in English
Implementing an Effective Lessons Learned Process By Mark Marlin, PMP Editor’s note: This paper was originally presented at the 2nd Annual UT Dallas Project Management Symposium in Richardson, Texas, USA (http://pmsymposium.utdallas.edu/) in August 2008. As a Media Partner for that event, PMForum agreed to republish selected papers in PM World Today. This paper is included here with the consent of the author and permission of the Graduate Program in Project Management at The University of Texas at Dallas School of Management, who is the copyright holder of the conference proceedings. All conditions and disclaimers of the copyright holder pertain. Introduction Since 1997, I’ve taught project management in both the public and private sectors. I always ask my students, “How many of you believe you have an effective Lessons Learned process that covers projects across your entire organization?” Seldom, do I ever see a hand go up. And when a hand does go up, and I investigate further, it usually is a process limited to “my department” or to “my business unit” or to “large special projects.” A number of students acknowledge their companies have formal or semi-formal Lessons Learned programs, but they are generally viewed as ineffective. And yet everyone believes an effective Lessons Learned process is important if an organization is going to be able to continuously improve on its project performance. In fact, in the Project Management Institute’s own A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide, Third Edition), the term “Lessons Learned” appears 63 times, which is no small indicator of the emphasis PMI® places on the subject. The PMBOK® Guide defines Lessons Learned as “The learning gained from performing the project. Lessons Learned may be identified at any point.” Learning can come from successes where we did something creative or imaginative and we would like to see it repeated on future projects -- and learning can come from our failures where something failed to meet our expectations and we would like to improve and not make the same mistake again. It would be nice to say most of the learning comes from our successes, but the reality is that most of the learning comes from our failures. In a survey by Ernst & Young of 130 PMI® members and guests at a PMI® meeting in October 2006, although 91% of the respondents believed Lessons Learned reviews on projects were important, only 13% said their organizations performed them on all projects and only 8% believed the primary objective of the reviews was to understand the benefits that would accrue to the organization. This paper discusses the barriers that prevent effective implementation of Lessons Learned and the keys to success in addressing these barriers and developing and maintaining an effective Lessons Learned process that can span the organization and be a valuable contributor to the organization’s overall goal of continuous improvement. Read complete paper in English
Managing Chaos in an Agile World By Samir Ray & Dipesh Patel, PMP Editor’s note: This paper was originally presented at the 2nd Annual UT Dallas Project Management Symposium in Richardson, Texas, USA (http://pmsymposium.utdallas.edu/) in August 2008. As a Media Partner for that event, PMForum agreed to republish selected papers in PM World Today. This paper is included here with the consent of the author and permission of the Graduate Program in Project Management at The University of Texas at Dallas School of Management, who is the copyright holder of the conference proceedings. All conditions and disclaimers of the copyright holder pertain. Introduction In 1994 the Standish Group published what is now a well known study on project management, The CHAOS Report. The study presented an analysis of successful, challenged, and impaired projects and stated that “software development projects are in chaos”. The results of this study have fueled much of the emphasis on project management and software development methodologies in the last 14 years as IT professionals sought to improve the success rate of their projects by better managing the chaos. While, the results from the latest studies are significantly better, they still leave a great deal of room for additional improvement. In recent years, Agile development methodologies have also been increasing in popularity. Empirical studies demonstrate their overall success in delivering better quality software and qualitative case studies tout improved results and overall customer satisfaction. While the results are highly desirable, the simple adoption of an Agile methodology is not sufficient to guarantee a higher rate of successful projects. Agile projects face many new challenges that continue to demand the need for expert project management. 1994 Standish Group CHAOS Report Read complete paper in English
|
PM World Today™ is a trademark of pmforum Inc.
PMWT™ is a trademark of pmforum Inc.
The information on this web site was checked for accuracy and authenticity when last updated. If there is any accidental infringement of copyright, the publisher of this site apologize for their actions, and would like to be notified. In addition, the publisher of this site cannot bear responsibility for the actions or the results of action of individuals or companies arising from use of information and advice contained within it.
PM World Today Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions.
© Copyright 2008 PM World Today