powered by FreeFind

 


Volume X - Issue V - May 2008

Featured Papers

 

Foundations, Frameworks & Lessons Learned
in Program Management

By Robert Prieto

The delivery of complex capital programs worldwide is increasingly challenged by the depth and breadth of management skills required for successful program execution. Capital programs today continue to grow in scale and complexity; face growing human and critical material resource constraints; require global resources or as a minimum compete for them; and are increasingly sensitive to successful execution in terms of schedule, quality and cost. Program management in the engineering & construction industry is focused on providing this execution certainty by putting into place the organizational, management and supporting frameworks which are prerequisites for successful delivery of large capital programs.

This paper reviews the ingredients of a successful program management approach and specifically differentiates it from good project management. While many of the tools and techniques of successful program management are similar to those applied in project management, the focus differs in some fundamental and important ways.


Read complete paper in English

 

About the Author:


Roberto Prieto

Robert Prieto is a Senior Vice President for Fluor, responsible for strategy in support of the firm’s Industrial & Infrastructure Group and its key clients.  He focuses on the development and delivery of large, complex projects worldwide. Prior to joining Fluor, Bob served as chairman of Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc.  He is a member of the executive committee of the National Center for Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, a member of the board of directors of the Business Council on International Understanding, a member of the board of the Civil Engineering Forum for Innovation, and co-founder and member of the board of the Disaster Resource Network. He currently serves on the National Research Council’s committee framing the challenges on Critical Infrastructure Systems. Until 2006 he served as one of three U.S. presidential appointees to the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Business Advisory Council (ABAC) and served as chairman of the Engineering and Construction Governors of The World Economic Forum and co-chair of the infrastructure task force formed after September 11th by the New York City Chamber of Commerce.  He is also a member of the board of trustees of Polytechnic University of New York.

 

 

 

Top of Page


 

Storey’s Gate
Churchill the Agile Project Manager - Part 21

By Mark Kozak-Holland

Most people are very familiar with Winston Churchill but may not be familiar with his “agile” approach to project management and his skills as a PM in the summer of 1940. With an invasion imminent Part 20 looked at the third area of the overall project (Part 16) RAF Fighter Command, and how emerging technologies could better manage its pilots and fighters in an integrated air defense or sense-and-respond system. This article looks at the fourth area of the overall project, command and controlof the whole system. A command centre at the heart of the solution was the final piece in the jigsaw.

For the British the Battle of Flanders/France was a wake up call as agility was the new paradigm in modern warfare. An agile war is dependent on making the best decisions quickly based on the best intelligence available. This starts at a strategic level with the commander at the top passing strategic directives that are cascaded to operational leaders to make decisions and implement in the field. Churchill as a soldier knew the importance of this, so in May 1940, when he visited the newly completed underground facility Storeys Gate, he recognized the value of a secure, and blast proof site. It was close to Downing Street and was designed to protect him, and the War Cabinet, from the expected air raids.

For Churchill it was much more than a bunker (see figure 1 below), and when he saw this he became very enthused to declare: “This is the room from which I will direct the war.” The facility was designed to provide Churchill a conducive decision making environment so he could respond with agility. It was a principal facility of close collaboration that made overriding decisions that affected the three other areas (Part 16-20). As a result, it subsequently became his new headquarters for the rest of the war.

Read complete paper in English

Read earlier papers in this series.

Churchill the Project Manager (Part 1) Churchill the Project Manager (Part 11)
Churchill the Project Manager (Part 2) Churchill the Project Manager (Part 12)
Churchill the Project Manager (Part 3) Churchill the Project Manager (Part 13)
Churchill the Project Manager (Part 4) Churchill the Project Manager (Part 14)
Churchill the Project Manager (Part 5) Churchill the Project Manager (Part 15)
Churchill the Project Manager (Part 6) Churchill the Project Manager (Part 16)
Churchill the Project Manager (Part 7) Churchill the Project Manager (Part 17)
Churchill the Project Manager (Part 8) Churchill the Project Manager (Part 18)
Churchill the Project Manager (Part 9) Churchill the Project Manager (Part 19)
Churchill the Project Manager (Part 10) Churchill the Project Manager (Part 20)

 

About the Author:


Mark Kozak-Holland

Mark Kozak-Holland’s latest book in the Lessons-From-History series is titled “Project Lessons from the Great Escape (Luft III)http://www.mmpubs.com/books-LFH.html. It draws parallels from this event in World War II to today's business challenges. His previous books include “Churchill’s Adaptive Enterprise: Lessons for Business Today”, “Titanic Lessons for IT Projects”, and “Avoiding Titanic Disasters: Project Lessons for IT Executives”.  Mark is a Senior Business Architect with HP Services and regularly writes and speaks (presentations and workshops) on the subject of emerging technologies and lessons that can be learned from historical projects. He can be contacted via his Web site at www.lessons-from-history.com or via email to mark.kozak-holl@sympatico.ca.

 

 

 

Top of Page


Catapulting Productivity with IT Project Management
and Corporate Governance

By Jim Miller

According to MIT Sloan Schools’ Center for Information Systems Research, companies with IT governance earn at least a 20% higher return on assets than organizations with weaker governance. And according to Gartner Research, the worlds leading information technology research and advisory company: The Project Office: Teams, Processes and Tools: IT organizations that establish enterprise standards for project management, including a project office with suitable governance, will experience half the major project cost overruns, delays, and cancellations of those that fail to do so.”

In other words, to thrive in today’s demanding high tech business climate, there is no question that IT Project Management must enlist the aid of strategies that accelerate progress.  To ensure best practice ideas, project management leaders, particularly in the IT world, must focus on keeping a team on track and above all, help to avoid costly mistakes. This is where IT Project Management and Corporate Governance come in.  


Read complete paper in English

 

About the Author:


Jim Miller

Jim Miller, PMP, CISSP, CISM is a Vice President
of an IT Global Information Security Project Management Office for a major Financial Services Firm located in Irving, Texas, USA. Jim is a seasoned technology project manager with over 25 years of experience in the field. He has established a proven track record of success in technology project management and has achieved remarkable accomplishments in terms of financial results and customer satisfaction. These results have led to numerous awards for operational excellence and customer satisfaction. Jim earned a Master’s degree in Project Management from the University of Texas at Dallas as well as a degree from The Richard D. Irwin Graduate School of Management at the American College. Jim is available for guest lecturing and speaking engagements and can be reached by e-mail at jim.miller50@gmail.com.

 

Top of Page


Adaptive Project Management

By Lev Virine, Ph.D.

Originally developed by ecologists, adaptive management has become a powerful framework for project management. It is a structured and systematic process to continually improve decisions and practices by learning from the outcomes of previous decisions. Adaptive management includes a number of organizational principles, such as iterative development and avoidance of irreversible decisions. Adaptive management relies of metrics and quantitative methods to integrate actual project performance to the management of projects.

What is Adaptive Management?

Will polar bears die because of global warming? Most likely not, as they, like all other living creatures, are capable of adaptation. Of course, if global warming is extreme, no adaptations the polar bears make will help them find suitable habitats. Nevertheless, the ability to adapt is a distinctive feature of all life.


Read complete paper in English

 

About the Author:


Lev Virine, PhD

Lev Virine, PhD has more than 20 years of experience as a structural engineer, software developer, and project manager. In the past 10 years he has been involved in a number of major projects performed by Fortune 500 companies and government agencies to establish effective decision analysis and risk management processes as well as to conduct risk analyses of complex projects. Lev’s current research interests include the application of decision analysis and risk management to project management. He writes and speaks to conferences around the world on project decision analysis, including the psychology of judgment and decision-making, modeling of business processes, and risk management. Lev received his doctoral degree in engineering and computer science from Moscow State University. Learn about his latest book at http://www.projectdecisions.org. You may reach Lev Virine at lvirine@projectdecisions.org.

 

 

Top of Page


The trend of Earned Value Management as a Cross-Industry
Best Practice: Conclusions and Lessons Learned From
Real-Life Implementations

By Alexandre Rodrigues, PhD, Prof., Eng., PMP

Introduction

The Earned Value Management (EVM) method has been introduced to the Project Management community for a number of decades.  Initially developed in 1962 as a result of a joint effort between NASA and the US Department of Defense, the practical application of this project controlling technique was for a long period of time confined to specific industries and types of projects, particularly to the defense sector and to large projects.  This phenomenon has mistakenly created the perception that EVM is only applicable (or worth applying), to these scenarios.  Our practical experience over the last ten years of using and applying EVM in the field, has demonstrated exactly the contrary: Earned Value can be used effectively in any type of project and industry sector, very often requiring little effort in small projects.  Ranging from small consulting projects with durations from 1 to 2 months and teams of 1 to 3 consultants, to large multi-year complex projects in the defense or telecommunications industries, we have been using Earned Value successfully.  This is not only because Earned Value is, per se, a very complete and effective method for project performance measurement and controlling, but also because we developed a set of unique extensions to the basic method along with additional supporting tools and procedures.  In this paper, we briefly present this extended version of Earned Value Management along with the critical factors for successful implementation, in particular communication and data quality issues.


Read complete paper in English

 

About the Author:


Alexandre Rodrigues, PhD, Prof., Eng., PMP

Alexandre Rodrigues is Executive Partner of PMO Consulting and a Senior Consultant with the Cutter Consortium.  Alexandre holds a degree in Systems and Informatics Engineering from the University of Minho (Portugal) and a Ph.D. from the University of Strathclyde (UK). He is a member of the Project Management Institute (PMI®) and a certified Project Management Professional (PMP®), a Chartered Member of the Portuguese Association of Engineering (CEng), and a member of the British Association for Project Management (APM). Alexandre was founding president of the PMI Portugal Chapter and is currently a PMI Component Mentor for Central and Northern Europe.  He is also an International Correspondent for PMForum in Portugal.  Additional information about PMO Consulting can be found at www.pmo-consulting.pt.  Alexandre Rodrigues can be contacted at Alexandre.Rodrigues@PMO-Consulting.pt.

 

 

 

Top of Page


 


PM World Today™ is a trademark of PMForum, Inc.
PMWT™ is a trademark of PMForum, Inc.

The information on this web site was checked for accuracy and authenticity when last updated. If there is any accidental infringement of copyright, the publisher of this site apologize for their actions, and would like to be notified. In addition, the publisher of this site cannot bear responsibility for the actions or the results of action of individuals or companies arising from use of information and advice contained within it.

PM World Today Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions.

© Copyright 2008 PM World Today
© Copyright 2008 PMForum, Inc.
unless otherwise noted.