powered by FreeFind

 


Volume X - Issue IV - April 2008

Featured Papers

 

Evolution of Owners Role Under Program Management

By Robert Prieto

Implementation of major capital facility programs requires Owner organizations to undergo change in several dimensions. Each of these dimensions involves a significant departure from the established management, operating, commercial and cultural patterns which have typically characterized the Owner’s capital delivery programs and processes.

Organizational Transformation must be achieved while the skills and capabilities of the current teams, their performance excellence, and accumulated lessons learned are retained and, in fact, a new larger, more diverse organization is built upon them to achieve the higher level of performance.

When considering this Organizational Transformation, two generic types of change must both be managed synergistically in order to effect the strategic change that is the goal in the decision to shift from a multi-project to program based delivery.

Tactical Change:

  • the basic changes in the way the projects are organized and executed, including the move from project to programmatic focus.

  • changes affecting all the execution activities which will be adjusted and/or implemented to accelerate the actual delivery of plant and production. 

Cultural Change

  • those changes dealing with the people aspects of reorientation of teams to programmatic focus

  • all these factors will dramatically increase the cultural impacts and interfaces which must be recognized and effectively addressed to ensure the harmony of vision, commitment, focus, and dedication that the program goals demand.  


Read complete paper in English

 

About the Author:


Roberto Prieto

Robert Prieto is a Senior Vice President for Fluor, responsible for strategy in support of the firm’s Industrial & Infrastructure Group and its key clients.  He focuses on the development and delivery of large, complex projects worldwide. Prior to joining Fluor, Bob served as chairman of Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc.  He is a member of the executive committee of the National Center for Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, a member of the board of directors of the Business Council on International Understanding, a member of the board of the Civil Engineering Forum for Innovation, and co-founder and member of the board of the Disaster Resource Network. He currently serves on the National Research Council’s committee framing the challenges on Critical Infrastructure Systems. Until 2006 he served as one of three U.S. presidential appointees to the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Business Advisory Council (ABAC) and served as chairman of the Engineering and Construction Governors of The World Economic Forum and co-chair of the infrastructure task force formed after September 11th by the New York City Chamber of Commerce.  He is also a member of the board of trustees of Polytechnic University of New York.

 

 

 

Top of Page


 

RAF Fighter Command
Churchill the Agile Project Manager - Part 20

By Mark Kozak-Holland

Most people are very familiar with Winston Churchill but may not be familiar with his “agile” approach to project management and his skills as a PM in the summer of 1940. With an invasion imminent Part 19 looked at the second area of the overall project (Part 16) creating intelligence and knowledge. This article looks at the third area, RAF Fighter Command, and how the clever use of emerging technologies and reengineered processes could better maximize the effectiveness of pilots/fighters in an integrated air defense or sense-and-respond system.

In June 1940 Air Marshall Hugh Dowding’s organization faced major challenges, despite his best efforts, with massive losses of 500 operational fighters in the air battle over Flanders and France. The RAF was about 50% below its target (set in 1939) with 620 fighters (out of 1,200), the minimum thought to win an air battle over the United Kingdom (U.K.). The fighters were outnumbered by a ratio of 2:1.

In 1935 when Dowding founded RAF Fighter Command he was aware that the Air Ministry was very slow in scaling up its fighter production schedule, and unlikely to reach minimum target levels required. So Dowding looked to other ways to assist his fighters in an air battle. The physical organization of Fighter Command was most significant with a geographically distributed hierarchy of stations (Group/Sector) and air fields networked to Bentley Priory the operational headquarters. Each sector had a main fighter base, with an operations room, maintenance and repair facilities, and satellite bases attached to it.

a total of 1,029 aircraft and over 1,500 personnel

Read complete paper in English
Read the previous paper in this series. Churchill the Project Manager (Part 19)
View the entire series at: http://www.pmforum.org/library/papers/index.htm

 

About the Author:


Mark Kozak-Holland

Mark Kozak-Holland’s latest book in the Lessons-From-History series is titled “Project Lessons from the Great Escape (Luft III)http://www.mmpubs.com/catalog/lessons-from-history-c-4.html. It draws parallels from this event in World War II to today's business challenges. His previous books include “Churchill’s Adaptive Enterprise: Lessons for Business Today”, “Titanic Lessons for IT Projects”, and “Avoiding Titanic Disasters: Project Lessons for IT Executives”.  Mark is a Senior Business Architect with HP Services and regularly writes and speaks (presentations and workshops) on the subject of emerging technologies and lessons that can be learned from historical projects. He can be contacted via his Web site at www.lessons-from-history.com or via email to mark.kozak-holl@sympatico.ca.

 

 

 

Top of Page


SIX SIGMA vs. PMBOK Complementary and Mutually Supporting Methodologies for Handling Projects

By TD Jainendrukumar

Six Sigma

Sigma (the lower-case Greek letter σ) is used to represent standard deviation (a measure of variation) of a population (lower-case 's', is an estimate, based on a sample). The term "six sigma process" comes from the notion that if one has six standard deviations between the mean of a process and the nearest specification limit, there will be practically no items that fail to meet the specifications. This is the basis of the Process Capability Study, often used by quality professionals.

Six σ is a set of practices originally developed by Motorola to systematically improve processes by eliminating defects. A defect is defined as nonconformity of a product or service to its specifications.While the particulars of the methodology were originally formulated by Bill Smith at Motorola in 1986, Six Sigma was heavily inspired by six preceding decades of quality improvement methodologies such as quality control, TQM, and Zero Defects. In addition to Motorola, many companies are adopting  Six sigma approach. The term "Six Sigma" is following a set of processes using necessary tools, has its roots in this tool, rather than in simple process standard deviation, which is also measured in sigmas. Criticism of the tool itself, and the way that the term was derived from the tool, often sparks criticism of Six Sigma.

Then what is Six Sigma exactly?


Read complete paper in English

 

About the Author:


TD Jainendrakumar

TD Jainendrakumar, PMP, has over 20 years’ of extensive experience in the areas of IT Project management/Head IT PMO in e-governance at Ernakulam District Collectorate, District Courts of Kerala, Central Administrative Tribunal Ernakulam, Rajeev Gandhi National Drinking Water Mission New Delhi and Principal Systems Analyst in National Informatics Centre, Madhya Pradesh State Centre especially in the following areas of specialization: 1. IT practice management (Project Management Methodologies, Tools and techniques, Standards & Knowledge); 2. IT Infrastructure Management (Project Governance, Assessment, Organisational Instructions & Facilities and Equipments); 3. IT-Resource Integration Management (Resource Management, Training & Education, Career Development & Team Development); 4. IT-Technical Support (Project Mentoring, Project Planning, Project Auditing and Project Recovery); and 5. Business Alignment Management (Project Port folio management, Customer Relationship Management, Vendor Management & Business performance management). He completed a Master of Computer Applications (MCA), a 3 year post graduate course deals with software Engineering and Project Management. He scored 4.11 out of 5 in the project management (2005) examination conducted by brainbench.com, secured a Masters Certificate in Project Management, and is one among the top scorers (First in India and 3rd position in the world in the experienced category).  Additional information about TD Jainendrakumar can be found at http://www.brainbench.com/xml/bb/transcript/public/viewtranscript.xml?pid=6557177.  He lives in India and can be contacted at jainendrakumartd@yahoo.co.in.

 

Top of Page


Martial Arts: The Essence of Project Management

By Quang Ton

The Chinese People have many longstanding traditions, some of which incorporate techniques and concepts applied in project management.  Two of these, Hung Gar, a form of Kung Fu, and the Lion Dance, a traditional costumed dance form, will be used to draw parallels with modern project management.

Hung Gar is a Martial Art formoriginated from the Shaolin Temple in the southern part of China.  Practitioners of Hung Gar must go through rigorous training and conditioning to improve themselves both physically and mentally.  Not surprisingly, project management concepts are applied throughout the training regimen in order to improve the likelihood of successful results.

The discussion presents a brief description of some of the similarities between the two disciplines. 


Read complete paper in English

 

About the Author:


Quang Ton

Quang Ton has been practicing Martial Arts since the age of 16.  He started with Shotokan Karate, migrated for a short period of time to Taekwondo and Judo, then pursue his passion with Capoeira (Afro-Brazilian martial art) and Việt Võ Đạo before stabilizing his foundation with Hung Gar—Shaolin Kung Fu.  He also holds a Masters degree in Engineering and is a certified Project Management Professional (PMP), a Certified Information Security Manager (CISM), a Certified Associate Business Manager (CABM) and has a Foundation certificate in Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL).  From a professional aspect, he is currently the Service Manager for Schlumberger Oilfield Services where he utilizes his skills in project management and service management to improve service quality and reach operational excellence.  Quang Ton can be contacted at pmi.qton@yahoo.com.

 

 

 

Top of Page

 

 

 


PM World Today™ is a trademark of PMForum, Inc.
PMWT™ is a trademark of PMForum, Inc.

The information on this web site was checked for accuracy and authenticity when last updated. If there is any accidental infringement of copyright, the publisher of this site apologize for their actions, and would like to be notified. In addition, the publisher of this site cannot bear responsibility for the actions or the results of action of individuals or companies arising from use of information and advice contained within it.

PM World Today Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions.

© Copyright 2008 PM World Today
© Copyright 2008 PMForum, Inc.
unless otherwise noted.