Volume X - Issue I - January 2008
Case Studies
Project and Program Retrospectives By Debra Lavell & Russell Martinelli For learning organizations, post-project audits and post-mortems are an established means for capturing key learnings from their projects and programs. However, at Intel we are rapidly moving away from both the post-project audit and post-mortem methods of collecting our key learnings, and moving to a considerably more effective method commonly known as retrospectives. The primary reasons for this shift in methods and practice are two-fold: post-project audits occur too late in the program life cycle to effect changes on the current program, and post-mortems have a negative connotation – historically focusing on what went wrong on a program, thus heavy on blaming and finger pointing. We are pleased to be able to present a series of papers for PM World Today focusing on program and project retrospectives, and how they are applied at Intel to capture key learnings and improve our program and project management practices. We begin the series by describing the retrospective methodology, differentiating it from other methods such as post-project audits and post-mortems, and presenting the benefits of using the retrospective method. We then describe what it takes to gain organizational buy-in for retrospectives, and provide a recommended process for introducing the method into an organization. Examples from our experience in moving organizations within Intel to the retrospective methodology will be presented. The third paper in the series will focus on the people side of retrospectives. We will describe how to deal with the human aspect of introducing change into an organization and requiring people to behave differently. We then discuss the nuances of conducting a retrospective for a highly distributed program or project team. Finally, we present two comprehensive case studies that present the process from beginning to end, and demonstrate the value obtained by the organizations and teams utilizing retrospectives to increase their organizational learning. It should be noted that this series of papers is written from the practitioner’s point of view. We work in industry, our experiences are first hand and real world, and the viewpoints we present reflect this perspective. Finally, we welcome your comments and feedback on the papers. We can be contacted at: info@programmanagement-academy.com.
Program and Project Retrospectives: An Introduction By Debra Lavell & Russell Martinelli
The intent of this first paper in our series on retrospectives is to establish the foundation for the retrospective methodology and why we are utilizing it at Intel.We explain what the retrospective methodology is, how is it different from post-mortems and post-project audits, and the benefits we’ve realized through the implementation of utilizing this method for improving our program and project management practices at Intel.
Read complete paper in English
|
PM World Today™ is a trademark of pmforum.org, Inc.
PMWT™ is a trademark of pmforum.org, Inc.
The information on this web site was checked for accuracy and authenticity when last updated. If there is any accidental infringement of copyright, the publisher of this site apologize for their actions, and would like to be notified. In addition, the publisher of this site cannot bear responsibility for the actions or the results of action of individuals or companies arising from use of information and advice contained within it.
PM World Today Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions.
© Copyright 2008 PM World Today